The only control you have when gambling at bank craps is, when to bet, how much to bet, on what to bet, when to play, and when to not play. Almost all gambling has those same controls. Other than that....ya bets you quarter and ya takes your "chances".
The math, built into my tracking program tells me I have influence. So after God calls OAP a fool, I will call him a fool also!
Not nearly the worst thing I have been called in my lifetime. I reckon I struck a nerve in another reply, hu? But sometimes our realities are different....imagine that!
I understand, but I believe it's probably more the "interaction" rather than control that you like. You get to physically hold the random number generators....some people even think they can influence those random number generators!
I think you really believe you have DI skills, and maybe the math you did supports that belief. If in fact, you really did the math right, to reach a valid confidence level that your rolls are no longer random, I wonder why you feel the need to share that information on a public forum. You have the key to the vault, why alert the vault owners?
Although I don't run in their crowd, DeMango is one believer whose described technique passes the smell test. He describes a scientific approach to his method. He claims that he shoots from the same position, at the same table, at the same location. He tracks every roll. With this information, results can be easily analyzed for dominant numbers and ratio of sevens. One thing that is left out of the analysis are the dice used. These always change. Some "seem" to be better than others, for obvious reason. Although the results are limited, since his outcomes are table-specific, there is certainly some validity with his process. He is doing what he can in an attempt to KNOW what has happened at a particular table, and using this information to bet in accordance with the information. The first thing a proponent of randomness would ask is "What good does knowing past results have to do with current or future play?" This is an excellent question. No doubt outcome frequencies change as more trials are factored in. Although I have never seen and do not know a thing about the bone tracker being used to analyze data, I at least have an idea why he tracks as he does. Linaway can show you an EASY way to track rolls of each and every shooter at a table while it is happening. In this sense, there is the advantage of analyzing the cubes currently in action. Regardless of what you think you know about what has just happened, does it really matter? All I know is that if what I see shows me things are happening as well as they can, I'm getting more chips into action. Worse thing that can happen is that I'll be bitching up a storm if things turn south, and return to the normal boring play.
Betting on the Super Bowl, roulette, or even online poker can be thrilling, and with the advent of online gambling, it's easier than ever before. Yet winning and losing can have unexpected effects on the brain that keep people coming back for more, scientists are finding. Gamblers sink an increasing sum of money into their efforts to win. Over the last 20 years legalized betting has grown tremendously; it's now a $100 billion industry. More than 65 percent of Americans gamble, according to Gallup's annual Lifestyle Poll conducted last year, and up to 5 percent of those betters develop an addiction to the activity. "For most individuals, gambling is enjoyable and harmless, but for others, it is as destructive as being addicted to drugs," said Catharine Winstanley, an assistant professor at the University of British Columbia's Department of Psychology
