As thousands of Donald Trump’s supporters were storming the US Capitol and chants of “hang Mike Pence” rang out from the angry mob, the then president purportedly told advisors that his vice president “deserves it.” The remarks by Mr Trump were heard by former staff who were present in the room when they were spoken, according to Liz Cheney, the https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...cs/donald-trump-hang-mike-pence-b2097960.html An Anonymous source quoted by Liz Chaney. That's convincing. The only souce?? https://www.google.com/search?q=Tru...rome..69i57.1344j0j1&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
When those who are in charge of enforcing the law are bought and paid for, as they are. It is no wonder why offenders are ignored. Here is a report of facts which easily explains how it happens. https://www.newsmax.com/politics/cities-crime-soros-social/2022/06/06/id/1073212/
BLM? Antifa? Somehow, they just don’t look the part. There is only one other person, of dull enough wit, to believe this.
I am still waiting for my Forum friends to address this. Is it bullshit? Is it one of those “he didn’t really mean it?” Is it just Trump being Trump? Did he really want to see Pence hanged? It’s gotta be one of these. Trump is toast. The media is going to be stuffing this story up our asses for a month. Trump’s loyal base might shrink from 35% to 30%. The “wouldn’t vote for him if he was running against Satan” group will grow from 50% to 55%. Just because I don’t support DJT, despite voting for him twice, doesn’t mean that I am an anti-American, leftist, brainwashed piece-of-shit. Time for me to go pick some winners.
evil will exist and florish if good men stand by and do nothing..........in essence, by your non-action, you support evil........doing nothing is not being nuetral. Pensce had a duty .....and it was to fight, if he thought his government was in the wrong, was 100% convinced of it, and the election was not fair. The result of the riot was to disupt and shut down the procedure going on at the time...i.e. challenging the electrol college vote..... like yacraps says....."when tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty" 777
No one is advocating or has been advocating rebelling against the Government. They have been questioning and disagreeing with a political party which is not following the Constitution, using the law and government agencies against the people. This is a fact. Worst part is the Political party and it's minions in the media is also co-opting the military. Another two years like this and the Republic will be lost. Can it be restored???
INSIDE your allowing to getting your feelings hurt the guys here luv and respect yuh....and in know way ever intended to insinuate that you are what you called yourself in your post I luv yuh dude now like you said get back to picking winners today ....check out my picks for the 4th race in the thread Belmont tomorrow
It's hearsay. That simple. You are being lied to and you believe the lies. Not your fault entirely as they have mastered the Hollywood presentation show trial. They are calling it a "Hearing", another lie. Calling it bi-partisan. Another lie. Chaney has been censored by the Republican party and Kinzinger has been voting with the Democrats for years. He is a Illinois liberal progressive. Not a Republican. Both are Lame Ducks. Do the best you can to see this show trial for what it is. Completely dedicated in stopping Trump from running in 2024. By any means necessary. Ask yourself why that is?? WHEN Republicans retake the house and senate in November it is all over. What will happen, and take my word to the bank here. Democrats will, using the media Ramp up Civil unrest to the point there will be indiscriminate deaths in the streets. Starting in the biggest cities and will find their way to every part of the country. Should Trump run in 2024 he will win. These leftists are frightened of what he will do to them for all their sedition and criminal actions. This so-called Hearing is being run by a illegitimate committee. It is not following the rules of the House or the Constitutional purpose of representation. I am not represented period. You must decide if you are being represented. Pick a side.
It is NOT so much what trump DID, as it is, what he did NOT DO. He either condoned the violence, or, as Commander in Chief, was derelict in his duty, to try to stop it. He should do about five years HARD time, for what he did NOT do. He was the GD President of the United States, and failed to act, when the Capital was under siege, and lives were in jeopardy. He showed just what sort of SHIT, he is made of.
AS usual you are quacking out your ass Duck. You make statements of what he condoned with zero just cause to validate your stupid statement. To begin with DUCK it was not Trump supporters who spearheaded the assault on the building. I have shown you several videos of Antifa and BLM supporters who were dressed in black who were the first ones in. Nothing Trump could have daid would have curbed that action. Second is there are NOW estimates of up to 30% of the crowd at the capitol while Trump was still speaking who were FBI and FBI associates dressed as Trump supporters, who again would NOT have listened to anything Trump would have said. So take your theory and make it into a Quack cork Duck.
So what did trump do? That’s right, absolutely nothing. “Mr President, a mob is sacking the Capital building, and attacking and possibly killing the guards, what are you going to do”? F’k em, they deserve to die, has anybody given them Biden’s address? Just in case push comes to shove, does anybody here want to be Vice President for about two weeks?” YOU, are just like a FLY, drawn to pile of shit, and your not the only fly buzzing around that pile of shit. Whoa, look at that BIG one over there.
Irving said that on January 4, he had discussed the possible use of National Guard troops with then-Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund and former Senate Sergeant at Arms Michael Stenger. “’Optics’ as portrayed in the media did not determine our security posture … We did discuss whether the intelligence warranted having troops at the Capitol, and our collective judgement at that time was no – the intelligence did not warrant that,” Irving said. Irving’s testimony appeared to be in direct conflict with Sund’s account. Sund said he had requested National Guard troops but that Irving “stated he was concerned about the ‘optics’ of having National Guard present”.
My feelings aren’t hurt at all. I don’t take any disagreement personally. And I respect other opinions. Many others don’t. That’s all that I was opining.
