OK, so if the late, great, never returning to this site rolleyes $ e $ is correct, here is where the "For Sale on Axis shooting" bullshit was devised. This explanation/proof for the validity of "on-axis" shooting is anchored in math ,, thereby making it easily verifiable, and not to be questioned, right? Wrong. It is two-dimensional dice nonsense, easily proven to be incorrect, when the dice are viewed, as they actually exist, in three dimensions. I bring this concept up again now out of respect for the Wizard from Kansas, whom I phoned a few days ago to say hello, and to order a product from. Since I intend to toss some dice at home until feeling safe enough to head into the casino, I have had the Wizard construct for me one his Roll Trackers. We spoke for a long time, I think it was this Monday past, and he told me that TDB also has one of his roll trackers. When I started talking about his Streak Detector, the Wizard advised me that, because he likes me, he will construct another of these and send it to me along with my roll tracker. I can hardly wait for this. As 777 knows, when I take the streak detector to the casino and start asking it whether or not I should put out a large bet, the suits will have a bird. I will be very curious to see how they react when I tell/show them exactly what I am using. This will be good, and I will keep you informed.