Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Dice Influencing' started by Dave G Ct, Jul 26, 2019.
You have been gone some and I was fishing this week.....
while we were gone TDV was busy attacking me,you Dom, GTC and any one that teaches
a class or has a gambling site.
This guy is exactly the dickhead I have thought he was...
That seems really strange, that this guy would have a lot in common with DeMango, when even "DeMango" doesn't have much in common with DeMango.
Welcome back Sir, glad to see you made bail.
According to , HIS POSTS he remains ,
"NET NEGATIVE" which simply means he becomes even more so
with each passing year . The reality is ,
"HE CAN'T WIN and he WON'T QUIT" and he has said
"he would never bother to learn and even if he did he would never practice.
He fits every definition of being a , "DEGENERATE GAMBLER".
His only avenue is to do everything he can to discredit people who
have the ability to win and in that way he feels that
"THERE IS NO HIERARCHY IN CRAPS & NO ONE IS ABOVE HIM ON THE
He is in a very unenviable position and he does everything he can to
DRAG OTHERS DOWN TO HIS LEVEL.
It has worked with some of the dumber among us they are what is refereed to as
"HIS LITTLE GROUP" .or as Demango calls them , "THE GROUP OF INSIDERS".
AssHall. For once why don’t you post positive proof instead of your unsubstantiated opinion. For starters here’s a few familiar names in the DI World that think SRR is very important to DI; very much opposite of your speculation:
MAD PROFESSOR: Craps Shooters Bible:
To find your SRR, take a sample of dice rolls during which you count total rolls and total sevens. Your SRR is the ratio of your number of sevens to your number of rolls.
Frank Scoblete: Cutting Edge Craps
In a random game of craps, the 7 comes up six times for every 36 rolls or once every six rolls. Naturally that is a long-range average. In short-run play, the SRR can be all over the board, but over time the SRR will begin to give you a very good idea of what kind of edge you have over the house. So, again, the SRR is one 7 for every six rolls, or 1: 6. If a shooter can start to reduce the appearance of the 7 to 1: 6.3 or better, he can get an edge at the game. The better the SRR, the higher the player’s edge will be over the game; that is the theory of the SRR.
Stanford Wong: Wong on Dice:
Estimating Your SRR You need to gather a sample of your in-casino tosses for several purposes. One purpose is to compare your results with random results, to be sure you really have an edge. Another reason for gathering data is to decide what dice set to use. Yet another reason is to figure out what is your edge over the casino in order to know how small to keep your bets in relation to the size of your bankroll.
There’s more AssHall, but just start with these three guys and tell us all how wrong they are and how more right you are based on something other than your opinion. Then we can move on to some of the other recognized DI advocates.
I had to open up a craps game to get it but luckily there were
many TDVeguess types there so it worked out OK
The guy tossing in the test IS a claimed skilled player.
I did a little asking around on GTC....and your counting methods are NOT what GTC and Frank advocate.
You better go ask them yourself as you seem confused in how they count.
I really didn’t think they would advocate counting or not counting a roll (and ergo inflating the data by +1) after seeing the result....and that’s true. They don’t.
Don’t know where the hell you got your counting methods, but it wasn’t from Frank or GTC.
These conversations may never move on until you drop your
child like habit of name calling and insulting.
You said "SRR is one 7 for every six rolls, or 1: 6."
It takes ONE 7 to end a roll , that is a given.
I want to know how many numbers I roll before THAT , 7 appears.
I look at how many rolls I get per 7s RSR.
Sevens to rolls ratio is a misnomer , always has been.
Claimed DI , So called DI what does all that mean?
You asked around??? Who did you ask???
Was the test set up to prove or disprove DI
Were a sufficient enough number of skilled players used
to arrive at a , "LARGE ENOUGH SAMPLE SIZE" from
various levels of skill??
ROFLMAO...the guy in the video tossing the dice is SUPERRICK!!!
What’s your point?....that he isn’t a claimed DI or a so called DI?
Prove these three guys wrong. we think your opinion is a misnomer, always has been. In addition Your reading comprehension and opinion suck.
What was his verifiable level of skill.???
Was there just the one or several DI's tested or just the one???
I wasn't making a point I was asking questions.
Your posts normally end with some snide remark about
reading comprehension. You abandon the conversation when
you feel you have lost and engage in personal attacks.
Weak , VERY WEAK .
It’s the same thing.
If you roll 36 times and get 32 non 7 rolls and four 7’s....you are averaging 9 rolls per 7 rolled.
Your RSR is 9.
Your SRR is ALSO 9.
I just have to wonder who is tying your shoelaces in the morning. It can’t be you.
No....you said to run the test accurately they should have a skilled player doing it. That’s not a question. That’s a statement.
The implication from you is they didn’t have a skilled player doing it.
If he was skilled....you would have had no need to indicate they should have a skilled player.
Squirm, baby, squirm.
No need to knock Superrick in the video.
I can certainly see why you would want to foster that
train of thought with your limited grasp of reality.
What I do fail to understand is why someone with your
apparent grasp of DI , tho limited , would still support someone
even more clueless than yourself , ie. TDVeguess in his efforts to
trash better players. You make no sense , unless your efforts are
in some unstable need to garner the occasional sign of approval.
If that is what floats your boat , HAVE AT IT.
It seems to me ,
YOU KNOW TOO MUCH TO BE SO EASILY SUCKED IN by someone
like TDVeguess and his , "LITTLE GROUP"
He has you talking , "FOR & AGAINST DI"
Your not worth the time.
This entire discussion is bull shit...……..TDV knows that, hw has been on here with that because he
cant find 160 posts where I called anyone a randie….so he has to attack and take the
focus off him.
Look at everyone he has attacked...good god and the guy has no skin the game, one the one hand
he says he has no skill at all,,,,which is exactly what he has..... but still wants to condemn everyone
else.....imagine the guy said the other day the cost of a LJ class at less than $1000 takes his play
for a year...….1 YEAR...……..shit we paid over a grand on boat gas this week for the tournament
and pre-fishing and we did all that without discussion or attacking any other guy fishing.....
Who in their right mind condemned for counting SRR differently when they dont...…..who in their
rights mind condemns a guy for a betting service that has never used the service, and finds one
guy that is not happy but does not bother to look for the cores that are happy.
TDV is a little twink…. his only importance is the feeling he gets for attacking or cutting on others....