Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Bankroll Management' started by dustedone, Nov 29, 2017.
I pay for it if I win with it, which I will, right?
Yes, you will win; as long as the parameters of the anamintronic fall into confindments of the progression.
Sounds like Rockwell Automation has beat you to it. I think they're working on a smaller version but are overlooking the fact that we degenerates want something we can use to win at craps ON A BUBBLE MACHINE, not in a driverless vehicle.
I had to return mine...my girdle spring and dingle arm did not work
Has the sound of a terraced, D'Alumbert, several versions of which I already employ. Have had reasonable success on the table game, but on the bubble, where the units allow, what would seem to be a much better game, it will NOT carry. It is my firm belief that this is not because of random deviation, but rather contrived results. As with any relative of the matingale, staying within the parameters, is the only problem, but a pretty big problem. I've never heard of the word "anamintronics" and niether has google. My original "game" was terraced at tens to the unit, but I think it works a little better if you terrace at 8 or 16. I also have a couple of versions, that, at least mathematically, reverse the inevitable upward movement, but with a pretty substantial "tariff" on the bottom line. If any of this makes any sense to you, get back with me, if not, then it may be that I'm further along with it than you are.
Sounds like a "support" issue. Are you sure your bellium was within tolerance?
LOL..to tell you the truth Midnight...I havent been having any tolerance for my bellium
Quote from Dustedone,
I have put in the time and had a major breakthrough just recently. but you will have to bankroll yourself w/ 30/30/30 split and a signed contractual agreement . that'll be 30% for you 30% me & 30% to the house.
Using your dustedone financial resources they me be a fair deal to some extent but not using the players that is a bad deal if I were to use my own money 70 percent to me would be fair you will maybe get a sucker at that 30/30/30 split but not many.
D'Alembert proved that – for incompressible and inviscid potential flow – the drag force is zero on a body moving with constant velocity relative to the fluid.
And my forpashade was defective. Not a good product.
And then I proved that he was right. Ma'am. But this does not have much to do with my post. I was speaking of his regression, system for betting casino games.
Explain how he was able to "prove" that fluid dynamics thing.
That's the least of your problems, Ma'am
He was throwing dice in his swimming pool
You wouldn't understand it. And you don't know how to spell D'Alembert, arschloch.
Not sure I know how to pronounce D'Alembert either. I wasn't talking about that guy anyway, I was talking about my next door neighbor, Andre D'Alumbert, he's a pretty good craps player, and an even better designer of betting systems. Ma'am.
Fred P likes to act as a spell cheker every now and thei I will mispell a word ot two to'
give him something to do.
What he delights in is apostrophes , he once told me I use too many
or not enough ,one or the other . He's a HOOT.
Then Sir, I would thank you for your offer and bid you good day.
That is a joke that percentage is a joke it's a Rip
Off 2 the player especially if he provides his own bankroll.
Common practices if I bring the bankroll and I bring the money and you bring the idea we split it fifty-fifty this is common sense across the board and all kinds of businesses in all kinds of games where gaming are we want to State it but if I bring the money and I brought you bring the method you bring the methodology or idea then it's 50-50 that's just common sense you're being overwhelmingly greedy and by the way who is the house I guess you're the house or who is the house???????
You do realize "your money, we split profit" is the oldest grift in existence? Dates back to the cave man.